Pages

20 July 2014

"The Field and the Barn"

Aleksey Savrasov, Rye (1881)
A sermon on Matthew 13:24–30, 36–43 (readings here), preached today at Church of the Incarnation, Dallas. Recording here.

♱     ♱     

The Tree of Life is a strange and beautiful movie by Terrence Malick.  Perhaps you’ve seen it. The film revolves around the life of Jack O’Brien and his relationship with his brother and parents.  It surrounds this family drama with epic scenes: the creation of the world, gestation and birth—even dinosaurs and the Reunion Tower.  Most scenes, though, are intimate flashbacks to Jack’s childhood in a 1950s Texas town.  In an important sequence, Jack as a twelve-year old boy is swimming with a group of boys on a beautiful summer afternoon.  Everything is sunshine and smiles.  Then tragedy:  a boy floats facedown in the water.  Men dive in.  Try to resuscitate the boy.  Fail.  Jack is right there  The scene shifts and Jack’s family is coming out of a church in funeral clothes.  The boys are silent but turn summersaults in the graveyard.  The scene shifts again and Jack is playing with friends.  There’s laughter.  But in a whispered voiceover, we hear what’s on Jack’s mind.  He’s crying out to God:  “Where were you?  You let a boy die.  You let anything happen.”  

If you are like me, you’ve whispered similar protests to God.  “Where were you?  You let anything happen. You let good people suffer. You let injustice unchecked.  You let the Holocaust happen.  You let Hiroshima happen.  You let my grandfather’s mind get eaten by Alzheimer’s.  You let my friend lose his job.  You let me get cancer.  You let...You let…You let...”  

We protest because we believe God is good and able to set things right, but things continue all wrong and we don’t understand why he doesn’t just step in and fix it.

The parable in today’s Gospel lesson raises precisely this problem:  Why does God seem to let anything happen?  You know the story: a man sows good seed into his field, but his enemy comes and sows weeds among the wheat.  The poisonous weeds grow up alongside the wheat, and their root systems become intertwined.  When the man’s servants see the weeds, they want to pull them up right away.  But he refuses!  He doesn’t want to risk rooting up the wheat along with them.  “Let them both grow together until the harvest,” he says, “and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, Gather the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn” (Mt. 13:36).

As Jesus explains to his disciples, the man in the story signifies himself, the Son of Man who sows the good seed, the good news of the kingdom, in the world.  The weeds signify the devastation born of the lies sown by the Enemy, the sin and evil that corrupt the goodness of creation.  The wheat is the people of God, the precious crop the Lord of the harvest waits to gather into his barn.  The weeds are destined for the fire, but the righteous for the glory of the Kingdom of God.

“Everything will turn out alright in the end,” Jesus seems to be saying, “you just have to be patient.”

But this doesn’t answer our question:  Why does God wait to pull up the weeds?  Sure, it’s nice to hear that God cares about the wheat and will bring it into his barn and all, but I’m stuck here in the field with all these weeds around me!  How does this help me bear living in the here and now?  Where death threatens to tear my loves from me, where the devil and the world’s pomp beset me, where there’s never enough to satisfy my desires, where I walk “by faith, not by sight,” where the whole creation groans.  “How does the hope of “the life of the world to come” help me endure all this suffering and evil?”, we ask.  My spouse is dying, and I’m worried about finances, and there are school shootings, and Syria’s falling apart, and it may come out alright in the end, but someone’s got to do something before everything goes to hell!

So we set about trying to fix things ourselves.  We’re self-reliant Americans after all.  And a lot of the time this strategy seems to work pretty well: We train better lifeguards, and fewer boys drown; we develop new medical technologies, and life expectancy increases; we get tough, and crime decreases; we reform education, and test scores improve.  

But then there are the times this strategy doesn’t work out so well.  Often even our best efforts have negative unintended consequences, and our impatience leads to disaster.  We seek justice, but put an innocent man on death row.  We want to prolong the life of our loved ones, but pump them full of medicines until they’re numb and place them in institutions where they die alone under fluorescent lights.  We work hard to provide for our families, but our marriages fall apart.  We try to reform the church, but end up sowing division.  We respect the dignity of every human being, but neglect the worship of God.  We seek to do good, but evil results.  All we wanted was to pull up the weeds, but we’ve uprooted the wheat as well.  We were not able adequately to disentangle the roots.  

And that’s the rub, isn’t it?  The root systems go deep, deep down: both wheat and weeds grow together in our hearts.  Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn puts it powerfully in The Gulag Archipelago:  “If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them.  But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being.” [2] Solzhenitsyn continues, “This line shifts.  Inside us, it oscillates with the years.  And even within hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained.  And even in the best of all hearts, there remains…an uprooted small corner of evil.” [2]


That the line between good and evil passes right through my heart helps me see the Lord’s delay in rooting out evil as good news.  If it were otherwise, a considerable portion of my heart might cling like clods of dirts to the roots of the weeds he pulls out.  As it is, waiting for his coming leaves room for repentance.  Our Lord is coming to judge the quick and the dead, and if he does “let anything happen” in the interim, it begins to seem like kindness and mercy and patience towards me, rather than negligence. St. Peter confirms this when he writes, “The Lord is not slow about his promise as some count slowness, but is forbearing toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance” (2 Pt. 3:9).  The Lord forbears for our own good.  Even in our own hearts, “he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust” (Mt. 5:45).

Knowing God forbears also with the evil in my own heart does help me endure life in the field.  Yet if we had just this parable to go on, we might think that God is standing somewhere off at the edge of the field, at a remove from the sufferings of our lives.  Thankfully, though, we know God not as a bystander to our lives, but as involved with us and for us.  He has made us, and we are his.  He cares for us.  He plants his people Israel; he stoops to tend their soil.  He prunes old branches and grafts in new.  And in Jesus, he has rooted himself in our field. Jesus is God-with-us.  He is both farmer and plant—the root of Jesse, the true vine.  He knows what it is to grow up alongside weeds, because “he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows” (Isa. 53:4), endured hostility and suffering and the cross.  He is the grain of wheat that has fallen into the earth, so that it might bear much fruit (cf. Jn. 12:24).  Risen from the dead, he is “the first fruits” (1 Cor. 15:20) of the great wheat harvest of the Resurrection.

This is the best news:  in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, God has already acted decisively to set things right.  He is making all things new.  He is the one who will establish his reign of justice and peace, who will relegate “all causes of sin” and all evil (Mt. 13:41) to the past; who will swallow up death forever.  

Because his redemption is sure, we can live in the joyful hope of the Resurrection.  Because God has won the victory, we can live without defense.  Because God is in control, we can live without needing to take control.  We do not need—indeed, are not able—to fix the devastation of the world.  All we need do is be faithful to God. [3]


And God is able to use our simple faithfulness in his care for the world.  Indeed, our faithfulness, our fortitude in the face of evil, is itself a sign of God’s renewal of creation.  “The truest fortitude,” says John Milton, is patience.  The truest fortitude is not allowing wrongs suffered for the sake of the good to turn us from following Christ.  This fortitude, this patience, is the fruit of the Holy Spirit.  That is, its presence is a sign that the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead is at work in our lives.  Patience is a foretaste of the peaceable Kingdom.  Our patient faithfulness anticipates the glory we will have in the Resurrection, when we shall forever “behold the fair beauty of the Lord” (Ps. 27:4) and “be like him, for we shall see him as he is” (1 Jn. 3:2).  

God is able to use our faithfulness in his renewal of the world.  Therefore, we can live joyfully in the midst of the sufferings of this present time.  I can’t say it any better than St. Paul:  “we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, and hope does not disappoint us, because God's love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit which has been given to us” (Rom. 5:3–5).  

♱     ♱     

[1] Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Gulag Archipelago, Part I, Chapter 4, “The Bluecaps,” in Edward E. Ericson, Jr., and Daniel J. Mahoney, eds., The Solzhenitsyn Reader: New and Essential Writings, 1947-2005, p. 231.
[ 2] Ibid., Part IV, Chapter 1, “The Ascent,” in The Solzhenitsyn Reader, pp. 265–6.
[3] My debt to the work of Stanley Hauerwas in the paragraph is obvious.  See, e.g., Stanley Hauerwas, The Peaceable Kingdom: A Primer in Christian Ethics, and Stanley Hauerwas (with Charles Pinches), “Practicing Patience: How Christians Should Be Sick” in The Hauerwas Reader (eds., John Berkman and Michael G. Cartwright), pp. 348–366.

22 June 2014

"A Perpetual Love and Fear"

Canon Andrew White, "The Vicar of Baghdad"
A sermon on Matthew 10:16–33, my first as a deacon, preached today at Church of the Incarnation.*

"And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell." —Matthew 10:28

In Baghdad there is an Anglican church called St. George's.  In many ways, St. George's is like any other parish:  there are baptisms, Holy Communion, sermons, pastoral care, weddings, funerals.  There’s a school there.  But St. George’s also has a dental clinic and a medical clinic where patients receive free treatment and medication; most of the clinic's patients are Muslims.  There's even a food distribution center.  But what really distinguishes St. George's from other churches are the bomb barricades that surround the building, the four security checkpoints that anyone visiting the church must go through, and the armed guards.

The Vicar of St. George's wears a flak jacket over his clericals and his cross.  That man is the Reverend Canon Dr. Andrew White, an English priest known as the "Vicar of Baghdad.”  He’s served St. George's since 1998.  At a hefty 6'3", traveling by helicopter and escorted by an armed convoy on his parish visitations, he's been described as "a gospel-toting James Bond."[1]  Like 007, Canon Andrew regularly faces mortal danger without fear.  Indeed, he describes almost nonchalantly the terrors he's endured:  "I've been hijacked, kidnapped, locked up in rooms with cut off bits of fingers and toes and things.  I've been held at gunpoint, been attacked, you know, the usual thing." [2]  Terrible things have happened to him, he says, but worse have happened to his Iraqi colleagues.  One year, eleven of his staff were killed.  Nevertheless, in the midst of all this violence and death, Canon Andrew exudes a sense of joy and utter fearlessness.

Canon Andrew embodies the fearlessness to which Christ call his disciples.  As we heard in the Gospel reading, when Jesus sends out his twelve disciples, he tells them not to fear.  Or rather, he tells them what to fear.

Let’s recall the story:  Jesus summons the twelve apostles and gives them his authority to proclaim the good news of the Kingdom of God and to heal the sick and suffering.  He sends them out with instructions to take neither money nor extra provisions, telling them to rely on the hospitality of strangers, to trust in God's provision.  Jesus sends them out with nothing to hinder their reliance on God's power.  They have nothing other than the authority he has given them and go with nothing to promise—not health or wealth or even success—they offer only life in the Kingdom of God, life with Christ.

He warns them of the opposition they will face as they announce the coming of God's reign, which calls into question all competing claims of allegiance.  He is sending them out "as sheep in the midst of wolves," because they go unarmed into a world made violent through the delusions of sin.  Jesus is straightforward about the cost of heeding his summons.  "Beware of men,” he says, “for they will deliver you up to councils, and flog you in their synagogues, and you will be dragged before governors and kings for my sake. [...] Brother will deliver brother to death, and the father his child, and children will rise against parents and have them put to death; and you will be hated by all for my name's sake" (Mt. 10:17, 18, 20).  Jesus warns the disciples about these wolves so that they may not fear the wolves.

As sheep relying only on the gifts of the Spirit, the disciples are unavoidably vulnerable; [3] they will suffer for the sake of the good.  But Jesus promises that those who patiently endure will be delivered from evil.  He promises those who follow him that they will find, as the prophet Jeremiah did, that the Lord is with them as "a dread warrior" to deliver their lives from the hand of evildoers (cf. Jer. 20:11).  As was the case for Jesus, this deliverance may happen beyond death in resurrection, but nevertheless the Lord of hosts will vindicate all those who trust in him.  The sheep should not fear the wolves ultimately because Christ, the Lamb that was slain, has conquered death.  Therefore, the sheep need not fear to follow Christ, even to the point of suffering death.

Not only need the sheep not fear, but they can "rejoice and be glad" when they are persecuted on account of the gospel, because this is what happened to the prophets and to the Lord Jesus.  For, as he says, "it is enough for the disciple to be like his teacher, and the servant like his master.  If they have called the master of the house Beelzebul, how much more will they malign those of his household?"  When they are maligned, the sheep are sharing in the suffering of their master, and for this reason they can take courage.  As John Chrysostom put it, Christ does not take away the terrors, but stands with the disciples in their perils:  "All he promises them is that they will suffer with him the utmost ills." [4]  With him.  To be with Christ is sufficient consolation for those who seek to follow him.

Jesus calls his disciples to fearlessness by teaching them what to fear: "Do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell" (v. 28).  That is, do not fear persecution, because in your suffering you are drawn very close to the one who was despised and rejected of men.  And do not fear death, because the love of God is stronger than death.  Instead, fear God, the maker of all things, and judge of all men.  Jesus is not here advocating a sort of Theo-phobia—being afraid of God in the same way we are of spiders, or the number 13, or heights.  We ought not fear God as we do evils.  For God is love, good all the way down, and in Jesus we see that God is always for us.

We ought to fear God, though, as our Creator.  We are his creatures and he is wholly Other than us, dwelling in light unapproachable, appearing “in cloud and majesty and awe.”  He is the Living One, pure act, utterly free, untamable, a consuming fire.  When God reveals his glory—on Mount Sinai in giving the Law or on Mount Tabor in Jesus’ transfiguration—people are bowled over; they fall to the ground in awe and wonder.  There’s an old Yiddish proverb that expresses it well:  “God is an earthquake, not an uncle.”

So, we are to fear, to revere, God as our Creator.  We are also to fear God in the sense of fearing that which would separate us from Christ.  This is a subtle point, so I want to be clear here.  On the one hand, once Christ has taken hold of you, there is no thing that can separate you from the love of God in Christ.  Nothing in all creation.

On the other hand, this side of heaven, we remain subject to temptation and continually need to pray, “Forgive us our sins.”  So we should fear turning from the Lord and giving into temptation. Fear putting yourself above your Creator, fear disobeying the commandments of God, fear turning away from the warmth of God's love to the coldness of the isolated self, fear not to be with the Lover of your soul.  Turn to God and cling to him not because you are afraid of punishment, but because of your affection towards him.  Fear the Lord God out of love, humbly seek to do what pleases him and to avoid what displeases him.  As you grow in love, your fear of the Lord will take less and less the form of concern not to displease him, and more and more the form of love, of affection and solicitude—you will be more and more like the child who seeks to please a loving parent, like the bride who beautifies herself for her husband. [5]

Fearing God rightly is the key to not fearing death. I suspect Canon Andrew, "the Vicar of Baghdad,” can face mortal danger without fear precisely because he fears God.  By God’s gift, he fears God rightly and so does not fear death.  He is like the prophets and apostles and martyrs who—as Augustine puts it—"in fearing, feared not; because fearing God, they did not regard man." [6]

The extraordinary witness of someone like Canon Andrew might lead us to think that such fearing in order not to fear is a sort of heroic virtue, something only for spiritual giants—and therefore not something we commoners should bother cultivating.  That would be a mistake for at least three reasons.
First, it is our Lord’s command, and he gives us the strength to carry out his commands.

Second, even spiritual giants are made, not born.  Canon Andrew is the bold and joyful Christian he is today because of a lifetime of discipleship.  My wife has a little print that reads, “The saints were saints only because they wanted to love God to the uttermost.”  That’s about right.  Although we should add that this desire led these would-be saints to set about doing all they could to put the love of God first.  The saints became exemplary witnesses to Christ’s story because of a series of acts of faithfulness—washing dishes, reading Scripture regularly, stopping to help someone in need, praying when they didn’t feel like it.  Through such small acts, love grows, and as love grows, so does the fear of the Lord.

The third and most determinative reason is that the fear of the Lord is a gift.  The long tradition of the church has held it to be the first of the gifts of the Spirit.  And because the fear of the Lord is a good gift, the one who gives good gifts to his children will not fail to give it to us if we ask.  In fact, we already have asked for this gift in today’s collect, when we prayed, “O Lord...make us have a perpetual fear and love of thy holy Name, for thou never failest to help and govern those whom thou hast set upon the sure foundation of thy loving-kindness.”  If our Lord was able to make a rag-tag group of Galilean fishermen into his apostles who would turn the world upside down, and if he was able to make an Englishman who suffers from multiple sclerosis into the fearless “Vicar of Baghdad,” he is surely able to pour out his gifts on us here in Dallas.  “Ask, and it shall be given you" (Mt. 7:7).

So: fear God and fear not!

"Are not two sparrows sold for a penny?  And not one of them will fall to the ground without your Father's will.  But even the hairs of your head are all numbered.  Fear not, therefore; you are of more value than many sparrows" (Mt. 10:29–31).


Amen.


For those who care about such things, Incarnation uses the BCP Lectionary, which explains why the readings are different from parishes using the RCL.
[1]  Timothy George, "The Vicar of Baghdad," First Things.
[2]  From documentary “The Vicar of Baghdad,” produced by ITV in the UK (part I, II, III, IV).
[3]  Here, and elsewhere, I am dependent upon Stanley Hauerwas, Matthew (Brazos Theological Commentary).
[4]  St. John Chrysostom, Homily on the Gospel of Matthew, 33.2, quoted from Matthew 1-13: Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture, p. 119.  NPNF 1 10:215ff.
[5]  Cf. St. Thomas Aquinas, ST II-II, q. 19 (“Of the Gift of Fear”).  I depend heavily on Thomas’ discussion of “filial fear” and “chaste fear”.
[6]  St. Augustine, Homily on Matthew 10:28, NPNF 1 6:306.

24 May 2014

The Resurrection as Reintroduction: Rowan Williams on Icons of the Resurrection of Christ

Fresco of the Anastasis ("resurrection"), Chora Church (14th c., Constantinople)
Congregavit nos in unum Christi amor.

The classic icons of the Resurrection depict the Lord Jesus’ descent among the dead. In the icon, Christ stands astride the shattered gates of Sheol, surrounded by a mandorla that figures the depths of the divine life,   He grasps Adam and Eve by the hand, while other characters from the history of Israel—David and Solomon, Moses and Samuel—look on.  

In a rich meditation on the icons of the Resurrection, Rowan Williams suggests that they show “the effect of God’s action on human history up to that point, and, implicitly, the effect of God’s action on all history.” [1]  The icon dramatically depicts Christ’s liberation of human beings from the place of bondage and division into the peace of God.  “We are compulsive dividers, separators, and in these divisions we deny ourselves the life God is eager to give,” but Christ is “the one who bridged all these divisions.” [2]

The icons of the Resurrections, Williams suggests, fit with the theological vision of the great seventh-century Christian thinker, Maximus the Confessor, who “speaks of how every one of the great separations human beings have got used to is overcome in the person and the action and the suffering of Jesus”:
“The divide between man and woman, between paradise before the fall and the earth as we now know it, between heaven and earth, between the mind’s knowledge and the body’s experience, between creature and creator—all are overcome in the renewed humanity that Christ creates.” [3]  
So in the icons where we see Christ reaching out to both Adam and Eve, “it is as if he is reintroducing them to each other after the ages of alienation and bitterness that began with the recriminations of Genesis.  The resurrection is a moment in which human beings are reintroduced to each other across the gulf of mutual resentment and blame; a new human community becomes possible.” [4]  Christ stretches out his arms of love across all our divisions and gathers us into one new humanity, for “he is our peace” (Eph. 2:14). 

If the resurrection is “an introduction”, it is so “because the resurrection of Jesus brings us into friendship with the divine life itself”:
“It is because the uttermost of death and humiliation cannot break the bond between Jesus and the Father that what Jesus touches is touched by the Father too.  As he grasps Adam and Eve, so does the Father; as he draws together the immeasurable past with all its failures and injuries, it is the Father to whom he draws it.  Because of his relation with the Father , a new relation is made possible between ourselves and this final wellspring of divine life.  The Christ of this icon, standing on the bridge over darkness and emptiness, moving into the heart of human longing and incompletion, brings into that place the mystery out of which is life streams.” [5]
Thanks be to God, for “Christ’s love has gathered us into one,” congregavit nos in unum Christi amor. [6]

[1] Rowan Williams, The Dwelling of the Light: Praying with Icons of Christ (Eerdmans, 2003), p. 24.
[2] Ibid., p. 30.
[3] Ibid., pp. 30-31.
[4] Ibid., p. 31.
[5] Ibid., p. 40, 41.
[6] From the antiphon “Ubi caritas."

14 February 2014

Kirill and Mefodii

By Audra Yoder
Mural painting of Cyril & Methodius by Zahari Zograf (1810–1853)
[Troyan Monastery, Bulgaria]

I. A Tale of Four Empires

Central and southeastern Europe in the ninth century was a convoluted mess. (Actually, I have difficulty recalling a period when southeastern Europe wasn’t hopelessly confusing. To me, it still is.)

Anyway, the Byzantine Empire was in the middle of a resurgence under the Macedonian dynasty. Its emperors were able politicians for once, arts and culture were flourishing after the iconoclastic controversy had died down, and the empire was in the process of winning back lands it had lost to Muslim Arab incursions.

Meanwhile, north of Byzantium, and taking up rather more territory, the Khazar kaganate was at its zenith. The Khazars controlled the most powerful steppe empire of the period, and ran one of the most successful trading conglomerates in the medieval world. The Khazars were a Turkic people; interestingly, pretty much all their high leadership converted to Ashkenazy Judaism at the beginning of the ninth century, and following this, the kaganate became one of the earliest states to practice religious toleration: under their leadership, Christians, Muslims, and Jews all lived together in peace.

Meanwhile, further north still, an amorphous mass of East Slavic tribes was in the process of transforming itself into something that would ultimately become Russia. The semi-legendary Norse princeling Rurik settled in Novgorod in 862, and the Rurikid dynasty he founded would rule Rus′, and later Muscovy, until the early seventeenth century. [1] Rurik’s descendant prince Oleg would seize Kiev in 878, and open up the Black Sea for East Slavic trade.

Meanwhile, in Central Europe, the West Slavic state of Great Moravia was in full swing. Under rulers Rastislav and Svatopulk I, Moravia achieved its greatest geographic size in the ninth century, controlling Bohemian, Hungarian, Polish, and Czech territories. This little empire was busily trying to disentangle itself from the more powerful Germanic and Frankish kings to its west.

Back in Byzantium, or more specifically, in the Greek city of Thessalonica, two brothers, Constantine and Michael, lost their father when Constantine was only fourteen. The boys came under the protection of a powerful Byzantine official, who provided them with a first-rate education.

Constantine, who would take the name Cyril upon becoming a monk, was ordained to the priesthood after he completed his education, and because of his knowledge of Hebrew and Arabic, was sent over to debate the concept of the Trinity with Muslim theologians. He became the unofficial head of Byzantine interfaith relations, engaging in fierce polemics with the Jewish aristocracy of the Khazar kaganate. Cyril even traveled to Khazaria in an attempt to stop the spread of Judaism there, but his mission failed, and the kagan subsequently imposed that religion on the entire population.

02 February 2014

On the Presentation of our Lord in the Temple


Miniature of the Presentation, "Menologion of Basil II" (Constantinople, 10th-11th c.) [Vatican Library, MS Vat.gr. 1613]
"When the time came for their purification according to the law of Moses, they brought him up to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord (as it is written in the law of the Lord, ‘Every firstborn male shall be designated as holy to the Lord’), and they offered a sacrifice according to what is stated in the law of the Lord, ‘a pair of turtle-doves or two young pigeons'." —Luke 2:22–24

I
Today is the feast commemorating the presentation of our Lord Jesus Christ in the Temple and the purification of his mother, described in Luke 2:22–39 as taking place forty days after his birth in accordance with the Law (cf. Lev. 12:1–4).  Known in the west as either the Presentation of the Lord or the Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the feast is one of the oldest in the church, observed locally in Jerusalem from early in the fourth century.  Originally observed on February 14, the feast is now universally kept on February 2.  In the west, the feast has been commonly known as “Candlemas” owing to the distinctive western rite of a procession with blessed and lighted candles into the church, a tradition which likely dates to the pontificate of Pope Sergius (687–701).  In the east, the feast is one of the Twelve Great Feasts and is called “The Meeting” (hypapante) because it commemorates our Lord’s meeting with Simeon “the God-Receiver” (Theodochos) and the prophetess Anna.


II
“[Christ’s] wish was to save us all completely and for our sake he bowed the heavens and came down.  When by his deeds, words and sufferings he had pointed out the ways of salvation, he went up to heaven again, drawing after him those who trusted in him.  His aim was to grant perfect redemption not just to the nature which he had assumed from us in inseparable union, but to each one of those who believed in him.  This he has done and continues to do, reconciling each of us through himself to the Father, bringing each one back to obedience and thoroughly healing our disobedience.
Detail of icon of the Presentation (Novgorod, 15th c.)
     “[…] Christ renewed the human nature he took from us and by what he did and suffered in his person united with our nature, he revealed it as sanctified, justified and completely obedient to the Father.  Among the things he did and suffered are the events we celebrate today, when he went up, or was taken up, to the ancient Temple for purification, was met by the God-bearing Simeon, and was proclaimed by Anna, who spent her whole life attending to the Temple.
     “After the Savior was born of the Virgin and circumcised on the eighth day according to the law, then, as Luke the evangelist says, ‘when the days of their purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord, as it is written in the law of the Lord’ (Luke 2:22).  He is circumcised according to the law, brought to Jerusalem according to the law, presented to the Lord as it is written in the law and a sacrifice is offered as the law demands.
     “Notice that the Creator and Lord of the law is completely obedient to the law. What does he achieve by this?  He makes our nature obedient in all things to the Father, he completely heals us of its disobedience and transforms the curse on it into a blessing.  As all human nature was in Adam, so it is in Christ.  All who received their being from the earthly Adam have returned to the earth and been brought down, alas, to Hades.  But, according to the Apostle, through the heavenly Adam we have all been called up to heaven and made worthy of its glory and grace. Secretly for the present, for it says ‘your life is hid with Christ in God.’  But, ‘when Christ shall appear,’ at his second manifestation and coming, 'then shall ye all appear with him in glory' (Col. 3:3). What does it mean by ‘all’? All those who have received the adoption of sons in Christ by the Spirit, and have proved by their deeds that they are his spiritual children.”

St. Gregory Palamas (1296–1359), from a homily given on the Feast of the Meeting of the Lord, between 1347 and 1359, in Thessalonica.*


* English translation: Homily 5.2–5 in Saint Gregory Palamas: The Homilies, ed. Christopher Veniamin (Mount Thabor Publishing, 2009).